How I think about Online Scams and Digital Ethics

How I think about Online Scams and Digital Ethics

Online scams are something for everybody to concern. Not only that it make people loose money, but they make people to lost their trust, giving them fear, and make people doubt everything. These aren’t just trick for individuals, they’re engineered, study, and done by organization, just for the sakes of attacks to people thought and feeling, and then use that knowledge to go against them.

To make the matter worse, we often blame the victims for falling for those tricks and scam. We often look at that as a personal failure than to try to understand it for them. The victims are being manipulated, not by some lonely scammers, but they’re often being organized by big groups, with scripts, specific targets, and strategies, making not one, but many people fall for the tricks and scams.

I think a good digital ethics starts with empathy. Anyone, no matter how good they are at technology, can be falls for tricks and being in horrible situations. I think its easy to tell everyone to “be careful with those links”, but the thing that actually help is to build and design system that pull people off those scams. 

 

CATEGORIES:

Uncategorized

Tags:

8 Responses

  1. I think your post is clear and easy to understand. The example feels real, so it helped me see how phishing actually works. I also like your tips because they are simple and useful. Maybe you can add one more detail about checking the URL. Overall, I learned something from your post.

    • Thank you so much for taking the times and read my post. I really try to make everything simple and useful and it nice knowing that my tips are helpful to you in someway.

  2. Basically, what you shared is true, but it’s too general. Everyone knows what online scams are. It’s not simply studying about how people think or feel and then applying methods to trick people. From my perspective, these behaviors are deeply rooted in human avarice, which comes from both the victim and the scammer. Well, in the bigger picture, there are different types of online scams tho, especially in this digital age where AI is already lending its hand in most aspects of our lives. These scams are actually getting out of hand. It’s no longer just a text or a link, nor a phone call, but it’s way beyond what we could have expected.
    Empathy in the digital world feels like a double-edged knife, bro. Empathy and love, true, are the ideal solution to every problem of a human being, but thinking this way is just too risky. To be honest, it’s possible, but at what cost? If anyone can endure their love for each other or even be patience to the other, then there would be no problem to solve. Back for a solution, we, humans, think rationally. Education is the best solution for now. If people are acknowledged or told to be aware of what could scam them, they will easily avoid them.
    Anyway, it’s a good post. I can see your enthusiasm through it. It is fully crafted with a problem, the reason behind it, and the solution to the problem. Keep it going, feel like you’re a nice dude.
    Thank you for sharing!

    • You’re right, and I appreciate the honest pushback. The avarice angle is something I ignore, and it’s hard to admit. It’s easier to frame victims as purely innocent, but greed does play a role sometimes, whether it’s chasing a deal too good to be true or something deeper.
      And yeah, the AI piece is where it gets genuinely scary. We’re not talking about Nigerian prince emails anymore, but now we’re talking deepfake voices, cloned faces, synthetic relationships built over months. Empathy as a weakness in that context hits different.
      I still believe education is the most realistic solution right now, so we’re aligned there. I just probably leaned too hard on the idealism. Thanks for pointing out the thing that I’m not really paying attention to, this kind of pushback makes the conversation actually worth having.

Leave a Reply to Yuka Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *